Campaign Finance Reform and the Problems with the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Supreme Court Case, 2013
Item
Call Number: UA137.008.033.00006
Scope and Contents
Tisch Library Undergraduate Research Award, Department of Religion
Dates
- Creation: 2013
Creator
- Merrin, Jacob J. (Person)
Access
Open for research.
Extent
From the Series: 18 Digital Object(s)
Language of Materials
English
Overview
In 2010, the conservative leaning Supreme Court, in the name of free speech, made one of the largest misjudgments in its history, namely the abolishment of campaign finance reform. (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Court ruled that, among other things, it was unconstitutional to prohibit corporations from indirectly supporting political campaigns or restricting the amount of money they could contribute to said campaigns. In addition, the Court legalized indirect contributions by trade associations, of which foreign institutions may be members. (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) As a result of this judicial action, the Citizens United ruling exposed the American political system to financial corruption and international influence.
Repository Details
Part of the Tufts Archival Research Center Repository
Contact:
35 Professors Row
Tisch Library Building
Tufts University
Medford Massachusetts 02155 United States
617-627-3737
archives@tufts.edu
35 Professors Row
Tisch Library Building
Tufts University
Medford Massachusetts 02155 United States
617-627-3737
archives@tufts.edu